Use cases
By organization
Featured stories
Latest from the blog
AI with full project context: Connect Nodes & Links with AconexNovember 5, 2026All blog posts →Featured guide
GuideThe Executive Guide to AI for Project DeliveryTest date confidence, understand project risk and focus interventions, with auditable evidence.Read the guide →All guides →Watch, read and learn
WebinarsLive sessions and on-demand replays.WhitepapersLong reads on where project delivery is going.ResearchThe peer-reviewed work behind the models.Platform coursesShort videos on getting more from the platform.The Physics of Project AccelerationOur book on pulling project dates forward.All resources →Use cases / Quality and compliance
Check every submission against your standard the moment it lands.
Same ground truth models underneath. Flip between the answer and the Integrity view behind it.
Not yet. Integrity is 84.9%, but four checks break your standard.
Same ground truth models underneath. Flip between the answer and the Integrity view behind it.
Not yet. Integrity is 84.9%, but four checks break your standard.
Same ground truth models underneath. Flip between the answer and the Integrity view behind it.
Not yet. Integrity is 84.9%, but four checks break your standard.
Asked in AI Mode
Trust your schedule before you act on it. AI Mode checks logic, float and data quality in seconds and shows you exactly what to fix.
Real customer projects, anonymized
“The contractor says 97.9% of links are Finish-to-Start, so no action is needed. Is that accurate?”
OThe figure covered 382 of 1,179 links. Across the full schedule it was 91.4%, with part of the schedule below the 90% DCMA threshold and 17 Start-to-Finish links unreported.
Why it mattered. The owner had four specific corrections to send back, with an evidence file behind every one.
“The contractor says 97.9% of links are Finish-to-Start, so no action is needed. Is that accurate?”
OThe figure covered 382 of 1,179 links. Across the full schedule it was 91.4%, with part of the schedule below the 90% DCMA threshold and 17 Start-to-Finish links unreported.
Why it mattered. The owner had four specific corrections to send back, with an evidence file behind every one.
“Give me the DCMA score for every project I can access, then show how much float each has lost.”
CA portfolio average of 88.0%, with one project 7 points below. 6 projects had used more than 90% of their baseline float.
Why it mattered. The team knew which projects to review first, without opening 20 schedules.
“Are any installation activities missing their delivery, purchase or fabrication activities?”
C1,153 installation activities, from steel decking to light fixtures, had no procurement link, so supply delays would never show as schedule risk.
Why it mattered. The planner got the full list in Excel and could fix long-lead items like steel, glass and HVAC first.
Open any answer in Platform Mode and check the math yourself. How it works
The 14 DCMA checks plus proprietary checks, run across every WBS and activity and scored green, amber or red against your thresholds.
Yes. Set a workspace default, adjust it per project if needed, and see exactly where any project differs from the standard.
Yes. Automated workflows check each update the moment it lands and alert the right people if it breaks your standard.
Yes. Go from the overall score to the exact activities failing any check, and export them in one click.