From Schedule Pressure to £14M in Acceleration Value

Explore how The Herne Group used auditable AI to test schedule recovery options, support acceleration decisions and track results on a live capital program.

Recover with evidence

When client-instructed change pushed forecast completion back by several months, the required finish date remained fixed. The project team needed a credible recovery plan supported by evidence that management and the client could inspect.

This guide follows The Herne Group’s approach to identifying, testing and implementing recovery measures using Nodes & Links. It covers the practical decisions behind process improvements, targeted fast-tracking and changes to commissioning working patterns.

You’ll see how generative, agentic and predictive AI supported the analysis, alongside the delivery expertise, commercial judgement and approvals needed to put each intervention into practice.

Follow the recovery

The initial analysis identified up to 39 calendar days of scenario-modeled recovery potential across several possible interventions.

The team then assessed feasibility, selected measures, secured agreement and implemented changes. By the September update, the project reported 15 days of improvement from implemented changes.

The guide follows these stages and explains how the team developed potential opportunities into approved recovery actions.

The project results

8 weeks
Acceleration recovery on the featured project. ​
£4 million
Savings associated with acceleration on the featured project. ​

Who it’s for

Written for planners, schedulers, project controls specialists and delivery leaders working on complex capital programs.

If you’re managing recovery, risk, change or acceleration, this guide offers a practical example of how auditable AI can help you investigate more options and strengthen the evidence behind your decisions.

Inside the guide: The recovery story

From Schedule Pressure to £14M in Acceleration Value
01
Find the options

Explore recovery opportunities that were identified across working hours, sequencing, resources, documentation and schedule logic.

02
Test feasibility

Assess the potential interventions against resource availability, cost, commissioning requirements, risk and client approval.

03
Stabilise delivery

Follow the process improvements that helped control the growing schedule variance, including earlier preparation and documentation activity.

04
Support approval

See how scenario evidence informed decisions about targeted fast-tracking and working days for selected commissioning activities.

05
Monitor recovery

Learn how the team used schedule updates and risk information to track improvements and identify further mitigation opportunities.

06
Trace the evidence

Understand how project data, analysis, assumptions and outputs supported recommendations that stakeholders could review.

From Schedule Pressure to £14M in Acceleration Value

Get your copy

Nodes & Links hates spam, and we will never share your details with third parties.