New: Document Integrations are live. See what your AI can read now

Customer stories / Data center

A 35-day overrun avoided before the wrong date was promised.

0%
chance of the planned date
P80
date committed instead
3
quantified acceleration levers
Models used
QSRARisk driversQCRAPAD Prediction
The challenge

“Can we commit to this date?”

A completion date was about to be committed to the client.

The solution

From analysis to a clear decision

The team used QSRA, Risk drivers, QCRA and PAD Prediction to get to the answer, with every result traceable to the schedule.

  1. Analyze: with QSRA, Risk drivers, QCRA and PAD Prediction

    Risk analysis showed a 0% chance of hitting the planned date.

The result

The commitment reset to the P80 date, avoiding a 35-day overrun.

0%chance of the planned dateP80date committed instead3quantified acceleration levers
Take it further

Ask it across every project, and run it on every update

The same risk and forecasting analysis, available to every team. Shown here as examples, not part of this story’s results.

Show your working

Every answer, explained

An answer is only useful if it holds up. Nodes & Links records the reasoning and model outputs behind every answer, so the team can see each step, check the math and share a recommendation that’s traceable.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

About this customer story.

Talk to our team

Yes. Every story comes from a real customer project. Some are anonymized to protect sensitive programs.

They’re listed under “Under the hood” on this page, with a link to the full use case.

Every project is different, but the same models and AI Mode are available to every customer. Book a demo to see them on projects like yours.

On the Customers page, where you can filter every story by use case.